Saturday, January 23, 2010

Casino ----- Money Maker or Life Destroyer?

The casino being built in Singapore is supposed to be a money-maker and job creator. However, many people have spoken against it.True, building a casino has a lot of advantages. It can create a lot of jobs for people, it can make a lot of money for Singapore. It can help Singapore grow economically.

However, with its advantages, comes a lot of disadvantages.Without the casino being built, many people already have an addiction for gambling, whether they are addicted to the casinos in Malaysia, or whether they are addicted to gambling dens anywhere else, they are still addicted to gambling. They would go to great lengths to gamble. Won't building a casino in Singapore make these addictions grow from bad to worse? I went to Genting, Malaysia once. What I saw really shocked me. I saw two parents giving their child A LOT of money to play at the game machines at the ground level while they went off to gamble at the casino. Kind of shocking huh? Imagine that your parents left you alone just so they could gamble their money away. Not very nice, in my opinion.

According to certain gamblers, they gamble because they think it is very exciting, it is like "holding one's own fate in their very hands", but come to think of it, even though some people might be lucky enough, they might win big, but to others, luck might not always shine on them. Even if you were to win some money back, most of the time, it moves you back to square one or you end up with less money than before. Also, by building a casino in Singapore, many people will gamble there excessively. By doing so, many problems related to the gambler's family relationship would surface. There would be more divorces, more arguing about money, more petty crimes so as to just be able to gamble for a couple more rounds. Some say, that without the casino, Singapore would be rather "backward", but I feel that by building the casino, it would lead to a lot of problems that would show us as being morally "backward".

Hence, to lessen the amount of people gambling excessively, Singapore decided to run "affordability tests" to check if a particular person entering the casino can afford gambling. Those people who are rich would pass the test with "flying colours", but what about the rest of the gamblers? Since they are unable to gamble in the casino, they would probably find some illegal way to gamble, for example, in an illegal gambling den. Then, there would be more crimes and hence, more problems.I feel that if we do not even build the casino, then lesser of these problems would surface.

Monday, January 18, 2010

Loansharks and Borrowers

Well, I will be posting about the above-mentioned topic.


Recently, there has been an article that states that goverment officials are thinking of making the borrowing of money from loansharks ILLEGAL. That means if you borrow from loansharks, BAM and you have just committed a crime. Well, do you think that doing so is a right thing to do? What are your opinions on this?


In my opinion, it is not very beneficial to a lot of people who are experiencing a financial crisis. I feel that the goverment officials are not putting the poorer group of people into consideration. Think of it this way. A lot of people who borrow money from loansharks due to the simple reason that they are unable to do so from banks. If you think that the bank is a charitable organisation, think again. They do not lend money to whoever asks for it. No, never in your life. There are a lot of conditions that has to be met in order to be able to borrow money from a bank. They have to check your salary, your financial status, your job etc. This is done so as to make sure that you are able to return the loan. Due to the conditions being set by the banks, many people are unable to borrow money as their monthly income is too low, or because their are in a financial crisis.

However, borrowing money from loansharks is simple. You ask them for money, they give it to you, you return it with interest, or else they beat you up. The bad point of it is if you are unable to return the interest, you would have to keep paying the interest until you are able to pay the principle amount. So one can keep paying the interest to the loansharks for practically their entire life.

Apart from that, many people turn to loansharks for"help" as they do not need to check the borrowers income or financial status just to borrow money. However, by making the borrowing of money from loansharks illegal, many people might not know who to turn to when in need of financial assistance.

I am not saying that borrowing money from loansharks is good. I am saying that you should not go around borrowing money in the first place. Here's a scenario. A nice happy family has a stable income and is living rather merrily. Then one of the family members goes around gambling and lands himself in a debt. They turn to loansharks for "help". However, they are not able to pay the debt and the loansharks go around beating up the family. Hmm... Not really nice eh? Just like that and a family goes destroyed.

Well that's the end of my 3rd post so see you soon...

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Indonesia rages over luxury jail cells for wealthy

Here's a newspaper article for you all to enjoy:

JAKARTA, Indonesia – It's a bedroom most poor Indonesians can only dream about _ air conditioned with a spacious double bed, flat-screen television, private bathroom, adjoining karaoke suite and serviced by maids and assistants.

But this bedroom is the prison cell of a woman serving a five-year sentence for bribing an Indonesian prosecutor.

News that business tycoon Artalyta Suryani had bought comfort behind bars using the same tactics for which she was punished has enraged ordinary Indonesians and embarrassed authorities in a country already known as one of the world's most corrupt.

The details of the luxury living conditions of Suryani and other rich prisoners have been splashed across the front pages of national newspapers and dominated television coverage this week, the result of a surprise visit to Jakarta Pondok Bambu women's penitentiary by a team set up by President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono to eradicate the so-called "Judicial Mafia."

"We found a number of wealthy inmates had been provided with exclusive facilities," team member Denny Indrayana said Wednesday. "They allegedly paid some corrupt individuals in the prison to get all they want. It shows the weakness of our judicial system."

Yudhoyono's government has made fighting corruption the centerpiece of its agenda, securing the convictions of several governors and legislators in recent years. But progress is slow in a country where graft is endemic especially among poorly paid law enforcers.

Transparency International still ranks the Southeast Asian nation among the most corrupt in the world, and scandals like this one still regularly embarrass the government.

Suryani was sharing her 8-by-8 meter (26-by-26 foot) room with her adopted child, who slept in a cot and was cared for by a full-time nanny.

A normal Indonesian prison cell is a cement cubicle a fraction of the size, often shared by dozens of inmates. Overcrowding is a serious and widespread problem.

Other perks in Suryani's cell included unlimited and unregistered visitors, private drivers to collect and drop off goods, beauty treatments, a private office with leather chairs and sofas, Tempo magazine reported.

"This total madness," Tri Agustine, a Facebook user, said in a posting on the popular social networking site. "Corruptors will not be deterred for committing graft again and again if the prison cells provided are like this."

Suryani has reportedly been moved to a general population cell, shared with three other prisoners, since the details became public.

"Investigation into other prisons is now under way to eradicate such practices," said Untung Sugiyono, director general of prisons at the Justice Ministry.

Reflections

When I first read this article, I was furious. How could someone actually bribe to make sure one has luxury in a jail cell? When someone is sent to jail, it is punishment for a crime or wrongdoing, and in hope that the convict would repent and change for the better. The life in jail is meant to be hard so as to teach the convict the consequences of the crime he or she committed. By enjoying a luxury in the jail cell, it defeats the purpose of being sent to jail in the first place. Suryani was sentenced 5-years in jail for bribing an Indonesian prosecutor, yet she bribes again in jail so as to have a luxurious life in the cell. This shows that she has not repented and was determined to have things her own way even in jail. Also, it was stated in the article that the other convicts in jail were only in cells that were a fraction of Suryani's jail cell, and that each cell was usually shared with other cell mates. This is deemed highly unfair, as she has the benefit of a large space, and did not even had to worry of the jail cell being overcrowded. How can the authorities in Indonesia expect the other convicts to repent when they gave priority and luxuries to someone who has money?

An air-conditioned room, a flat screen television set, a karaoke suite, a double bed and a lot of maids and assistants, not to mention a full-time nanny. This is something that even the average class people dream about. If anyone can enjoy a luxury in jail just by being rich, then what is the point of a jail cell then? What is a jail sentence to a rich and corrupt person if he or she can still live in luxury even when he is in jail?

The jail was facing a lot of overcrowding problems and quite a few convicts had to live in a single cramped jail cell, yet there are people who are serving their jail terms in cells that are much bigger and spacious, and only has one occupant per cell. If everyone was treated fairly, and if the individuals in the jail did not accept the bribes, each of the convicts would not have to squeeze too much in a single jail cell. Sadly, not a lot of individuals are able to do such a thing, since greed has the ability to drive man on to do many unimaginable things. If we are able to set aside our greed, then perhaps lesser people would have to suffer.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Random Introduction

Well hi, this is my first random blog post. Please note that this blog is meant to be a purely educational blog which is actually my LA homework... LOL!

Here's a bit more of myself. I am actually a VERY out-going (Never in my entire life) and also very sporty (Maybe in a million years). I grow a year older on every ??/?? and am currently ?? years old now (If you think that the provided information is totally random, please note the blog name and URL). Well, I like to play table tennis and soccer because I just like it (Don't ask why, it's just another random comment). I absolutely LOVE mugging (Well, maybe in a millennium...or so) and I generally do not like geography(I find it rather dull discovering so much that is not really alive...XD) Well, I am in Robotics, and I enjoy it immensely (Due to reasons that are totally random). Actually that's all there is to me... Wow, I've got a boring life...so typical...

During my spare time, I usually like to read (Yes I know that my life is rather pathetic) and when I fell like it, practice playing the piano. Most of the time I just want to slack and play my PS2 (This is rather outdated).

That's really it to me... so...till the next post...